“Woman on Top” Sex Position Responsible for Most Penis Fractures


A man’s penis is his pride, but certain sex positions can hurt his pride and manhood for a long time.

“Woman on top and “doggy style,” two of the most enjoyed sex positions, are reportedly the riskiest positions related to penile fractures. They are also responsible for subsequent developing penile dysfunction.

But it is the “woman on top” position that takes the prize for fracturing a man’s penis the most. Some patients recalled hearing an audible “crack” at the moment of fracture.

From the patients examined, most were injured during heterosexual intercourse, with a smaller number representing homosexual intercourse. The research also found that mere penis manipulation could cause damage to the penis.

“Our hypothesis is that when woman is on top she usually controls the movement with her entire body weight landing on the erect penis, not being able to interrupt it when the penis suffers a wrong way penetration, because the harm is usually minor in woman with no pain but major in the penis.”

The findings were extracted from a research conducted between January 2000 and March 2013, of patients at three emergency hospitals University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas (PUC), Campinas, and Mario Gatti Municipal Hospital (HMMG).

These findings suggest that the traditional “missionary,” “man on top” sex position is probably the safest. This is because, “…when the man is controlling the movement, he has better chances of stopping the penetration energy in response to the pain related to the penis harm, minimizing it.”

Copyright 2020

A Crisis of Roles: Understanding the Power and Purpose of Men


woman at work with baby

By Olivia J. Scott LIKE ON FACEBOOK 

“As humorous as that may sound, our men are faced with what could be the biggest threat in the whole of their existence. It’s not the proliferation of nuclear weapons, or a possible World War III, or an inability to be a man, it’s us—women.” (Olivia J. Scott)

Think about the following for a moment.

“Your father used to bring home the bacon, but now your wife is bringing home not only the bacon but the pig. Besides that, she owned two pigs before you married her. She doesn’t want any bacon from you; she already has bacon. If both husband and wife are now bringing home the bacon, then who’s the provider? That’s a problematic question for men. If both are paying the mortgage, then who’s putting the roof over their heads?”

Your father says, “Put her in her place.” You say, “But the place belongs to her.”

As humorous as that may sound, our men are faced with what could be the biggest threat in the whole of their existence. It’s not the proliferation of nuclear weapons, or a possible World War III, or an inability to be a man, it’s us—women.

There has long been a paradigm shift in the roles of men and women. There is heightened conflict over what really is the man’s place in society, the conflict being more palpably evident in the First institution—the family.

The Women’s Liberation Movement, and the relentless clamor for female independence, does not help the shift, and is feared by many men and anti-feminists as a dreaded threat to the world’s manhood.

“In many ways, the woman has taken over not only the man’s traditional role of provider, but also that of protector. She has mace, she has a gun in her purse, and she has a cell phone to call the police instantly. So what does the man do? He says, “I’m your protector,” and she says, “I don’t need you to protect me.”

The traditional acquisition of ideas and roles of manhood, by sons, from their fathers, has become practically extinct, since more than enough households are now matriarchal, demonstrative of the role-shifting. The man is hardly anywhere to be found!

Though pleasurably immersed in the independence they fought for, women complain bitterly of men not taking up their roles and responsibilities as fathers and husbands. But women have to ask themselves “How did we contribute to this frowned upon escape phenomenon, so evident in our neo culturalism?” Added to that eye-opening question, perhaps, a few gentle proverbial reminders that you cannot expect to “eat your cake and still have it.”

Have we in fact and in truth, by our actions and contemporary beliefs of our roles, confused men, having them doubt their manhood, their abilities, their potential for contribution, their own roles and functions, and their place in the lives of their women and children?

We call for men to be “responsible,” but we are guilty of displaying selfish double-standards by being, consciously or unconsciously, irresponsible when we present ourselves as all-capable and self-sufficient? With this attitude and approach, we defeat the roles men are ready and willing to play, even before they try. However, while a degree of solipsism may be allowed for both men and women, and while the man is inherently regarded as the head of the home, it is unnecessary to evoke a superiority-inferiority divide.

Gender equality advocates would call this “equality.” Call it what you may. Others may call it a “partnership,” two partners, one ship, one man, one woman, one head. Here is where the misconception may have started, though. Being designated “the head” of the household does not mean that men are the bosses of women, or that women are inferior to men. At some point, and in various matters, men vis-à-vis women each have functional advantages over the other. The superiority-inferiority complex has to be laid to rest, as it is the foundation for relationship and gender conflict.

A Cultural Twist and the Cultural Dilemma

Men don’t only need acceptance, they need to feel loved, respected, and valued. But “The independence of women is diminishing men’s traditional value to them.”

“In addition, since a woman’s childbearing and child rearing was what formerly brought her respect from her husband, the man now has to find another way to honor his wife. Because of the traditional patterns, when a wife demands respect from her husband today, he sometimes think, “Well, what are you doing to earn it?”

On the flip side, “Some women wonder, “How am I supposed to be submissive when I make more money than my husband, and the house and furniture are mine?” In other words, she’s saying to the man, “You have to earn the right for me to submit to you by giving me something I haven’t already given to you.”

That’s a tough statement for a man to hear. So the man says, “Well, I can’t give you anything because you owned more than I did from the beginning.” How does a woman submit to somebody whom she believes she is supporting? It’s a difficult situation for both men and women. But it’s the world we live in.”

“It’s a different world. Men don’t know what they’re supposed to do for women anymore.”

But men can counteract the stance taken by women not through frustration or retaliation, but by re-strategizing.  They should change their thinking by viewing their identity and purpose as not based on roles. They can adopt a new consciousness of who they are and what determines their manhood, avoiding societal trends to confuse them or influence their understanding of themselves.

“Men therefore need a God-given identity if they are to fulfill their true purpose….Once more, we must realize that when men are ignorant of their true identity, it affects not only their callings and fulfillment, but also that of their families and of society as a whole….I believe if we don’t address the male’s identity crisis, our whole generation is in trouble. There’s no escaping this fact.”

The above was inspired by the book Understanding the Purpose and Power of Men, Dr. Myles Munroe.

YOU MAY LIKE these other articles

All rights reserved 2020

Ladies, Stop Messing Up from the First Date!


So you and this guy went on your first date, you parted and he promised to call, but he never did. Now you’re wondering, “Why didn’t he call me back?” Because he thinks you treated him like a wallet, dammit! That’s what the guys said when I had a heart-to-heart with them the other day. It pays to talk to men sometimes so you can see things from their perspective. We women think we know it all but there is no need to be arrogant. If we listen long enough to men talk about their approach to dating and relationships, there are some mistakes we are likely to avoid.

Men Can Smell a Gold Digger a Mile Away

Men avoid gold diggers, no matter how pretty or intelligent you may be, and they make every effort to judge you, even from the first date. When my guy friends confirmed this to me, I asked, “What about women who are sophisticated and naturally like the finer things in life? Are you saying they are gold diggers too?” I was told that it doesn’t really matter how she is, but what she portrays. This perception is made based on what she does and says from the first date.

So for example, if she chooses to go shopping after she invited him to meet up with her, and makes him pay for all she bought, or she have the guy take her to a high-end restaurant on the first date, where she chooses the most expensive meals and beverages on the menu, she’s about to kick her next date with him out of the window. Of course, there are some women who just do that for fun and get a kick out it. Those are the kind of women that set out to use men, and make a bad name for the rest of us.

Make a Good First Impression

Some of you ladies will scoff at this and say, that’s what men are for, to be used to finance everything that you do. It’s not about who will pay the bills. It’s about how you market yourself. When you go on dates, it’s not just about meeting up and having a good time. It’s also about role play and selling your personality to the other person. You would want to be on your “A-game” so you can leave your date with a positive impression of you, especially if you do want to see that person again. Sometimes though, even with good intentions, you may end up selling yourself short.

Treat a Man the Way You Want to be Treated

Men are just like us, they form their own impressions of things based on speech and conduct. As women, we would be immediately disgusted at a guy who conveys to us, in some way or the other, that he is trying to get “some” on the first date. For some of us, even kissing is prohibited on the first outing, so how the hell is he going to suggest we get down like that?

That just does it and that’s when we give him the third degree and kick him to the curb, because we are not that “type” of girl, right? Exactly. That’s the way guys think too. They will drop you like hotcake if they think that you perceive them to be wallets with money pouring out of them. They will think this way whether or not they have the money to “throw away.

Ladies, while it’s nice to have the superior things in life,  you don’t need to sell yourself short to get them. Each date is like a test. You’re being assessed and you will be judged based on your performance. If a guy is that much into you, believe me, just be cool and soon he will be showering you with gifts and trying hard to fulfill all your needs.

And all of this has nothing to do with whether you are independent or not. Beauty, glamour, intelligence, and independence are attractive qualities, but in the end guys will stay for your personality. That’s what matters.

Be Considerate on Your Date

So next time you’re going on a first date, keep it real, be sensitive and considerate. Don’t try to empty his pocket so that you can go and boast about it to your friends the next day. He’s not a walking bank and he sure ain’t stupid.

You may think you’ve used him, but in fact you’ve sold yourself for pennies, literally. Then you wonder how come you’re so pretty and intelligent, yet you’re still single. Guys are not the gullible creatures you think they are. They know that game you may have up your sleeves; they know that playa. So stop looking at your phone and begging it to ring. He ain’t calling you again.

Copyright 2020

We Are Not Intimidated by Independent Women


By Contributor of Woman to Woman

Of course, men are not “intimidated” by “independent women”. Why would we be? What is supposed to be scary about it? “Ooooh, she makes money too!”

The women who put this theory forward are in fact bitter, not that their careers and status repel men, but that their careers and societal status don’t attract men. Men aren’t attracted to money and power, women are. We are attracted to great figures, beauty and youth. So, you can put this “intimidation” theory to bed, there’s nothing to be intimidated by. We just don’t find the same things attractive that you do, and gaining money and power in the hopes that men will flock to you is a dead end.

More solipsism here:”They [independent women] want an assertive woman who knows what she wants and knows how valuable she is. She must have a high self-esteem and sense of self-worth, and can appreciate herself and her man.” (Ella Bradley,Why Some Men Chase After Independent Women)

Just because you want an assertive man doesn’t mean we want an assertive WOMAN. Ladies, take your heads out of the sand and smell the fresh air. And no, we aren’t “threatened” by your assertiveness, it just isn’t what we find attractive. If you want to know what we are attracted to, just listen to US instead of your girls. Here it is, let me solve this mystery once and for all. It’s very simple, here is an itemized checklist of what men find attractive:

1. Ample, shapely figure
2. Youth

That’s it. Everything else, we could take or leave. And another flaw that repeatedly crops up is the myth of the “independent woman”. There is no such thing as an “independent woman”. A woman is never independent, from the time she is born until the day she dies.

She has Affirmative Action to make sure she gets a job, she has Title 9 to make sure she gets into sports that she may or may not be good at, she has millions of unpaid bodyguards in the form of any man that may be standing around. If she is good looking, she can eat, drink, and/or live for free, any man will happily provide these things for her. She has preferred status in welfare, government housing, and nearly all other social programs. She takes for granted the chivalry of all the men around her. If her car breaks down and she needs a ride, someone will happily provide it for her (most likely a man), whereas a man in her exact situation, located in the exact same spot will have to walk to his destination.

Men make up 85% of the homeless, that’s how “independent” women are. They almost never have to provide for themselves. It’s easy to be “independent” with people happily providing you with services that save you millions of dollars over a lifetime for free. “She doesn’t need a man to make her feel good.” Assertions like this are incredibly unattractive. You may not need a man to make you feel good, but you do need men to mine your oil, minerals and natural gas, provide you with electricity, farm your food, ship your goods, invent new labor-saving devices, protect your freedoms overseas, protect you within the confines of your country, protect your legal interests, advise you financially, invent new surgical and medicinal medical techniques to save your life, and just about every other area of your life you take for granted.

This “girl power” fad has gotten way out of hand. Women are increasingly divorced from reality. Your attitudes and unrealistic expectations, wishful thinking, and constant demand for self-aggrandizement has led to an over 40% out of wedlock birthrate, and catastrophically-declining birthrate. Enough is enough.

If you want to know what men want, ASK US. If you insist on NOT listening to us and instead continue failing in your goals by using a strategy designed to attract WOMEN, not men, that is based off of what YOU like, then quit blaming US with these ridiculous charges that we are intimidated or threatened or are simply immature. We aren’t intimidated, we aren’t threatened, and if anyone is immature, it is the side that refuses to learn from their mistakes and maybe have a conversation with men like adults.

Feel free to COMMENT below